Can Christians get Tattoos according to the Bible?
Posted on : 05-11-2011 | By : Jonathan | In : Bible Studies
Tags: christian, leviticus 19:28, tattoos
3
I had a hard time finding a Bible study on tattoos that:
- Was comprehensive
- Wasn’t fueled by emotion more than scripture
- Wasn’t based around a pre-conceived answer the author clearly had before putting the study together
I will try to keep the commentary on this study to a minimum while we examine the scripture.
——
What we will cover:
- The meaning of Leviticus 19:28
- How to consider Old Testament laws today
- How to deal with the issue of tattoos using New Testament scripture
The only scripture that directly references what we today would consider tattoos is Leviticus 19:28.
Lev 19:28 Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD.
To better understand this scripture, we need to examine the context. Leviticus 19:27‐28 addresses four things:
1) Shaving the head a certain way 2) Shaving the beard a certain way 3) Cutting the skin 4) Marking the skin
Leviticus 19:27‐28 Ye shall not round the corners of your heads, neither shalt thou mar the corners of thy beard. Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD.
Taking time to identify how these four acts are addressed in scripture will not only help us understand the context of verse 28 better, but will serve as a good example of how we should examine Old Testament commandments from the New Testament (new promise or covenant) which we are now in.
Here are two other passages that address three out of the four items on the above list:
Lev 21:4‐5 [But] he shall not defile himself, [being] a chief man among his people, to profane himself. They shall not make baldness upon their head, neither shall they shave off the corner of their beard, nor make any cuttings in their flesh (emph. added).
Deut 14:1‐2 Ye [are] the children of the LORD your God: ye shall not cut yourselves, nor make any baldness between your eyes for the dead (emph. added).. For thou [art] an holy people unto the LORD thy God, and the LORD hath chosen thee to be a peculiar people unto himself, above all the nations that [are] upon the earth.
These three passages all reference at least three things: the shaving of the head, the cutting of the beard, and the cutting of the flesh. Leviticus 19:28 is the only one that specifically mentions the Hebrew words “qa’aqa’”, which means “an incision or gash, to mark (2)”. The KJV translates this as “print marks upon you”. Some newer versions like the NRSV actually use the word “tattoo”. The word tattoo was not used in the English language at the time of the KJV translation (1), otherwise the KJV may have said tattoo as well. This is the only time this particular Hebrew word is mentioned in the Bible.
The Hebrew word we translate as tattoo is only used once in the Bible.
In each of the three passages doing something for the dead is referenced. While it does not name each individual act as a pagan ritual relating specifically to the dead, some would make a case that each of the four acts listed above could be related to doing something for the dead. Since Leviticus 19:28 is the only verse that references tattoos, it’s worth examining closer. Let’s look at the other three items referenced in order to give us better context.
Shaving
While at first glance Leviticus 19 may not seem like shaving the head, when one looks at the Hebrew word used for round, naqaph (Strong’s H3562), we see it most likely means to cut short, shave off, or even strike the flesh:
“3562: to strike with more or less violence (beat, fell corrode); by imp. (of attack) to knock together, i.e. surround or circulate; – compass (about, -‐ing), cut down, destroy, go round (about), inclose, round”.(2)
Often this word is simply used to surround, but other times it is not:
Job 19:26, to “destroy(nagaph) this body…”
Isaiah 10:34 “cut down (nagaph) the thickets…”
Isaiah 29:1 “let them kill (nagaph) sacrifices.”
In light of the definition, it makes sense to interpret Leviticus 28:18 as shaving the hair, or cutting marks in the hair or even the skin of the head.
Like many commandment in the Old Testament that seem odd or somewhat pointless in our American culture, God had reasoning behind each commandment.
“There was a superstition even in trimming themselves used by the heathen, which must not be imitated by the people of God: You shall not round the corners of your heads. Those that worshipped the hosts of heaven, in honour of them, cut their hair so as that their heads might resemble the celestial globe; but, as the custom was foolish itself, so, being done with respect to their false gods, it was idolatrous.” (7)
“Herodotus tells of the use of this type of haircut, forming what is called a tonsure, as the practice of pagan religious cults of ancient times who did so honoring one of their gods.”(3)
In Ezekiel, we read that Levite priests should not shave their heads, but keep their hair trimmed and from growing too long.
Ezek. 44:20: ‘Neither shall they shave their heads, nor suffer their locks (hair, long hair of head(2)) to grow long; they shall only poll (to cut, clip, trim, shear(2)) their heads. (Word definitions added)
We read places in the Bible where the Israelites shaved their heads and/or beards, but for a general lifestyle, they were not supposed to.
Lev 14:8-‐9 For Cleansing Purposes
Num 6:9, Num 8:7 For cleansing and repentance purposes
Duet 21:12 Taking a woman to wed from among Israel’s enemies, her head would be shaven
Acts 21:34 To show a vow period was over and had been fulfilled (the hair and beard would not be cut during the vow period). To shame others:
1 Chronicles 19:4 As a discrace to David’s men
Isaiah 15:2 A disgrace
Jeremiah 48:37, Micah 1:16, Ezekiel 27:31 To show defeat, humiliation
Regarding the Cutting of the flesh
Circumcision: Circumcision was commanded by God for all the Israelites and for any servants of the Israelites (Gen 17:10-‐14) Circumcision set God’s people apart.
Ear Piercing: God commanded the Hebrew bondservant who desired to stay with his master after his time was up to be pierced in the ear. This was a sign that we would be the master’s slave for life (Ex 21:6).
“The cutting of one’s flesh also characterized pagan worship as attested by the priests of Baal on Mount Carmel in the contest with Elijah”(3).
“The practice of making deep gashes on the face and arms and legs, in time of bereavement, was universal among the heathen, and it was deemed a becoming mark of respect for the dead, as well as a sort of propitiatory offering to the deities who presided over death and the grave. The Jews learned this custom in Egypt, and though weaned from it, relapsed in a later and degenerate age into this old superstition (Is 15:2; Je 16:6; 41:5)”(4).
“nor print any marks upon you” (v:28 )—by tattooing, imprinting figures of flowers, leaves, stars, and other fanciful devices on various parts of their person. The impression was made sometimes by means of a hot iron, sometimes by ink or paint, as is done by the Arab females of the present day and the different castes of the Hindus. It is probable that a strong propensity to adopt such marks in honor of some idol gave occasion to the prohibition in this verse; and they were wisely forbidden, for they were signs of apostasy; and, when once made, they were insuperable obstacles to a return. (See allusions to the practice, Isa 44:5 Rev 13:17 14:1 )”(4).
“The making a large bare space between the eyebrows was another heathen custom in honor of the dead (see on JF & B for Le 19:27, 28; JF & B for Le 21:5). Such indecorous and degrading usages, being extravagant and unnatural expressions of hopeless sorrow ( 1Th 4:13 ), were to be carefully avoided by the Israelites, as derogatory to the character, and inconsistent with the position, of those who were the people of God [ Deu 14:2 ]” (5).
The cutting of the flesh in Leviticus 19 is specifically referenced as for the dead, the section about marking (tattooing) the skin however, appears to be a general commandment.
Now that we’ve defined the context of why these commandments were given, we need to address the question of, “How do these Old Testament commandments apply today?”
How do these Old Testament commandments apply today?
Some laws in the Old Testament were given just for the sake of setting the Israelites apart (a peculiar people, holy unto God), some were given for protection, some were moral laws; while many were a combination of all three. The forbidding of eating certain kinds of animals was done to set God’s people apart, as well as possibly keep them from eating animals that could potentially harm them in that environment. The former reason holds more weight then the latter however, given the fact that the Israelites were allowed to share or sell animals that they considered “unclean” to non-Israelites (Deu 14:21). It’s clear to us – and most of the rest of the world today – that eating bacon is not morally wrong. Therefore, we can conclude that the commandment to abstain from eating certain animals was given to set God’s people apart among the culture of that time. It was not a universally moral issue such as murdering or stealing. However, to be righteous with God, the obedience or breaking of the commandment would have moral consequences for the Israelites because the commandment was given to them.
Here is another example: In Leviticus 19:19, it says, “…neither shall a garment mingled of linen and woolen come upon thee.” I don’t think anyone in any culture would argue that combining these two fabrics is morally wrong. This was another law that was maybe put in place to set God’s people apart and possibly to counteract superstitious or pagan practices that were going on at the time. And if we investigate further, we can see a practical and protective reason that God might have given this commandment:
“The law, it is to be observed, did not prohibit the Israelites wearing many different kinds of cloths together, but only the two specified; and the observations and researches of modern science have proved that “wool, when combined with linen, increases its power of passing off the electricity from the body. In hot climates, it brings on malignant fevers and exhausts the strength; and when passing off from the body, it meets with the heated air, inflames and excoriates like a blister” [WHITLAW]. (See Eze 44:17, 18 ).” (6)
As mentioned before, some laws are universally understood to be moral laws, such as not marrying another family member, not sleeping with a beast, etc. No Christian today needs to be told that this behavior is sin. Even though the New Testament does not say one shouldn’t sleep with a beast, we know it is morally wrong. Most would agree that shaving one’s head or beard is not morally wrong in today’s culture. The question then arises:
Is the commandment to not tattoo one’s body a moral law that did not need to be repeated in the New Testament because we should just know it is morally wrong? Or is it a commandment for the Israelites in their time and culture to keep them safe and holy? Tattoos today are very safe and sterile, back then they would not have been.
This is the first question the readers must answer for themselves. At this point in the study, if the reader feels convicted by God (by God) that not getting a tattoo it is a moral commandment that every Christian should know to obey and they would be guilty of sin if they did get a tattoo, so be it. However, one must look at the fact that while almost all Christians consider marrying your mother-‐in-‐law or sleeping with a beast to be morally wrong by nature, there are many who do not feel tattoos to be wrong. They feel tattoos are about as wrong as wearing a sport coat that is 65 percent wool and 35 percent linen.
Therefore, we must examine what the New Testament says regarding issues that are not specifically addressed in the Bible.
An example of this would be smoking marijuana. The New Testament does not say we shouldn’t smoke marijuana, but it does say we should be sober and not engage in drunkenness or excess of wine (Gal 5:21,1Pet 4:3, Tts 2:4, 1 Pet 4:7). Marijuana impairs the natural mind and senses similarly to alcohol or many other drugs. Therefore, we can conclude that any drug (even caffeine) that produces a drunken-like effect in a person is sinful. Any substance that is consumed to the point of making one not sober can be considered contrary to the word of God. Now, what if you need to take a prescribed drug for medial purposes that has this effect before going to bed or into surgery, is it OK then? Of course it is. And now we can see why the New Testament is more than a list of dos and don’ts. The list would be endless, and new things and circumstances would always be coming into existence. If every substance or drug was listed in the Bible, a new one would come along and people would say, “Well, the Bible doesn’t say we shouldn’t do this, so it must be OK”. I know people who have reactions to caffeine that makes then not sober. Should we declare a law then that caffeine is of Satan? No, caffeine is fine for me in moderation, but not for my friend. Being a Christian involves knowing God’s word, but also being led by the Holy Spirit. Jesus said the words that he speaks are “Spirit and Life” (John 6:63). So just because the black and white letters of the New Testament do not specifically address tattoos, this does not mean that we cannot find the answer in them. It just means we need to be led by the Holy Spirit when seeking for it.
And now we can see why the New Testament is more than a list of dos and don’ts. The list would be endless…
We are no longer under the O.T. Law.
Galatians: 3:23 -‐26 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster. For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
It’s also important to point out that even in the Old Testament, the law was still a spiritual thing.
Romans 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.
Even the idea of loving your neighbor as yourself as been around since the Old Testament. (Luke 10:25-‐28, Leviticus 19:18)
So regardless of the commandment, God expects us to be spiritual minded. This means that for decisions which are not specifically addressed in the Bible, we need to weigh them up according to the Word of God, council with elders, and seek to be lead by the Holy Spirit. For instance, we know not to murder. But we can murder with our thoughts by entertaining them. We can murder with our tongue by the things we say. Simply following the letter of the law is not enough.
So what are some things to consider when the Bible is not clear on an issue?
If the reader had concluded that Leviticus 19:28 is not necessarily a commandment that applies in today’s culture as a moral law, the rest of this study will seek to offer an answer from Romans 14.
Romans 14:23 Hast thou faith? have [it] to thyself before God. Happy [is] he that condemneth not himself in that thing which he alloweth. And he that doubteth is damned if he eat, because [he eateth] not of faith: for whatsoever [is] not of faith is sin.
I recently read an article (cited below) that phrased it in this very understandable way. Here is what this issue of tattoos may come down to: Not “Is it OK for a Christian to get a tattoo?” but “Is it OK for me to get a tattoo? (8)”
Not “Is it OK for a Christian to get a tattoo?” but “Is it OK for me to get a tattoo?”
Please read all of Romans 14, and then ask yourself these questions and reference the appropriate scripture again.
- What are your motives?
- Does getting/not getting a tattoo cause me to despise my brother? Rom 14:3
- Am I doing this for God? Rom 14:6
- Will it cause somebody to stumble? Rom 14:21
- Will it offend my brother or sister? Rom 14:21
- How does my spouse feel? You are both one body. Eph 5:31 (OK, not Romans but very applicable)
- And once you come to your conclusion, remember: You shouldn’t pass judgment on somebody else if they have the freedom you don’t have in an area. Rom 14:3
As you review Romans 14, try replacing “eat” and “meat” with things like “get a tattoo”, “wear shirts that reveal my stomach”, etc.
Examples:
vs 6 He that tattoos his body, tattoos his body to the Lord, for he giveth God thanks; and he that does not approve of tattoos, to the Lord he does not approve of them, and giveth God thanks.
vs 21 It is good than not to get tattoos, or to wear overly revealing clothes, not anything whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak.
Let’s expound on this.
Because it’s applicable to what we are trying to uncover in this study, we should briefly address earrings.
Q. Why are earrings in women not nearly as big of an issue as tattoos? You know… earrings… cutting multiple holes through the flesh and hanging metal through them.
A. Because almost no one is offended by them in our culture. Paul’s exhorts the churches not to defy existing social norms to avoid bringing reproach to the church when he asks the women to pray covered (1 Corinthians 11:16). Back then a woman praying with her head uncovered would be frowned upon in that culture. Today, it’s not an issue. We see then that cultural norms play into the decision making process that a Christian should go through in regards to standards of holiness, and trying to not offend as many people as possible.
We see then that cultural norms play into the decision making process that a Christian should go through in regards to standards of holiness…
The Greek word for offend in Romans 14 is proskomma: 1) a stumbling block a) an obstacle in the way which if one strikes his foot against he stumbles or falls b) that over which a soul stumbles i.e. by which is caused to sin. (2)
When I say “not offend as many people as possible”, here is what I’m getting at. First let me say this, somebody will be offended no matter what you do. If you wear a green shirt you will offend somebody. If you appease the person you offended by switching to a red shirt you will offend somebody new. We can’t be overly concerned with people’s opinions of us. But Paul exhorts us to become all things to all people, so that we may win some (to Christ).
1 Cor 9:19-‐22For though I be free from all [men], yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more. And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law; To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law. To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all [men], that I might by all means save some.
2 Cor 6:3 Giving no offence in any thing, that the ministry be not blamed:
Would a tattoo hinder or aid your lifelong ministry of relating to as many people as possible? If it would hinder it, it is contrary to the example set by the Apostle Paul.
Look again at the Greek word proskomma. Does a tattoo cause you or somebody else to stumble in their faith, or cause them or you to sin? If something is not done in faith, it is sin (Rom 14:23). One needs to examine their heart. If there is any conviction at all about getting a tattoo, it would be wise to refrain based off the scriptures we have just read.
Here is another point to consider if one feels neutral on the subject, but desires to get a tattoo.
In our walk with Christ, we grow. We go from milk to meat (Heb 5:12), as our knowledge of God grows, our wisdom grows (Eph 1:17). If one is a fairly new Christian who is about to make a permanent decision about marking their body, it would be wise to first add knowledge and temperance to their faith before making this permanent decision (2 Pet 1:5-‐9).
In short, put about as much thought into getting a tattoo as you would getting married. It would be advisable to pray, fast, and seek council. Weight the benefits of a tattoo against the points covered in Romans 14. If nothing convicts you to the contrary, it is your choice. Without any conviction from the Holy Ghost in your heart, it would be difficult to argue that your tattoo is sin based on scripture.
Let me briefly add however, that even if you are not convicted for your own sake, if you are a part of a ministry who’s policy is not to get tattoos for the sake of outreach and/or testimony, then you need to consider if being disobedient to the elders of the ministry God has called you to is wise based on scripture (Romans 13:1-5).
Without any conviction from the Holy Spirit in your heart, it would be difficult to argue that your tattoo is sin based on scripture.
We will now briefly discuss those who use the reference that your body is the temple of God, so you shouldn’t get a tattoo.
1 Cr 6:18-‐20 Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body. What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost [which is] in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God’s.
While this passage is specifically referencing fornication (sex outside of marriage), people will use it to say a person is defiling the temple of the Holy Ghost by marking their skin. There is nothing wrong with the principle behind this argument in general, but all the meat to justify this argument is really in places like Romans 14. Simply saying that tattoos defile the temple of God is an obtuse argument that is difficult to put reasoning behind. Does being overweight defile the temple? How overweight or underweight does one have to be to reach the “sin” factor? If I take the cheap multivitamins instead of the expensive ones, my body won’t be as healthy as it could have been. Am I defiling the temple? I’d be healthier and there wouldn’t be bags under my eyes if I got eight hours of sleep instead of only six. Have I sinned? What if the tattoo says, “I love Jesus”. Wouldn’t that be like putting a very nice decorative sign on my temple? One can now see how 1 Corinthians 1:19 may be used to help support taking the decision to get a tattoo seriously, but has difficulty standing on it’s own as a reason one should not get a tattoo.
1. “Tattoo.” How Products Are Made. 2002. Encyclopedia.com. 20 Oct. 2011 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>.
2. Strong, James. Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: World, 1986. Print.
3. Coffman’s Commentaries on the Old and New Testament, Leviticus 19:28
4. Jamieson, R., Fausset, A. R., Fausset, A. R., Brown, D., & Brown, D. (1997). A commentary, critical and explanatory, on the Old and New Testaments. On spine: Critical and explanatory commentary. (Le 19:28). Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.
5. Jamieson, Robert; A.R. Fausset; and David Brown. “Commentary on Deuteronomy 14.” . Blue Letter Bible. 19 Feb 2000. 2011. 29 Oct 2011.
6. Jamieson, Robert; A.R. Fausset; and David Brown. “Commentary on Leviticus 19.” . Blue Letter Bible. 19 Feb 2000. 2011. 29 Oct 2011.
7. Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, Leviticus 19:27
8. Fairchild, Mary. “Tattoos and Christians – Should Christians Have Tattoos?” Christianity – About Christianity and Living the Christian Life. Web. 1 Oct. 2011. <http://christianity.about.com/od/faqhelpdesk/f/tattoochristian.htm>.



You’ve done a lot of work on this!
Interesting point about ear rings.
[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us ’0 which is not a hashcash value.
Jesus Christ said “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfil them. For truly I tell you, until Heaven and Earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the Kingdom of Heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the Kingdom of Heaven.” (Matthew 5: 17-19 NIV)
In spite of His words, theologians in general have been “explaining” that Mosaic law no longer applies to the followers of Jesus today! However, I prefer to read what the Bible actually says – the words that are actually there – and not what I would like it to say.
The Bible also teaches us:
But:
“See that you do all I command you; do not add to it or take away from it” (Deuteronomy 12: 32 NIV)
“The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may follow all the words of this law.” (Deuteronomy 29: 29 NIV)
Even so, it’s very common for theologians to say that Mosaic law no longer applies because everything was “fulfilled” when Jesus was crucified. They ignore that He said, in the above passage, that ALL of the Law will remain in place until Heaven and Earth disappear. It is true that He fulfilled the prophets when He came to Earth and was put to death. And He did fulfil the Law by being put to death, as required by the Law, on behalf of all those whom He saved by being executed in their stead. But many of those whom He saved were born after the crucifixion, and many haven’t even been born yet! So, if the Law was revoked when He hung on the cross, then none of those born after the event would need to be saved because “…. where there is no law there is no transgression.” (Romans 4: 15 NIV). And no person today would be indebted to Jesus Christ. Nobody would be a Christian.
It is, therefore, a serious fallacy to say “Jesus fulfilled the Law therefore it no longer applies to us.” The truth is that “He fulifilled it on our behalf BECAUSE it still applies to us!”
So, if I don’t understand anything, then I shall read and reread and endeavour to understand what God is teaching us, rather than rationalize according to whatever theories are in fashion. We’ve been warned “See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world rather than on Christ.” (Colossians 2:
Religion comes from God and is handed down to men. But people are now being captivated by such things as tattoos, for example, which, not so long ago in Western society, were used only by criminals, whores and certain other members of society. Tattooing has moved from the bottom upwards, rather than from God downwards, and we now have tattooists selling “Christian tattoos” when no such things exist. The Law states “Do not cut your bodies for the dead or put tattoo marks on yourselves. I am the LORD.” (Leviticus 19: 28 NIV) And the Law is still in force.
And regarding self-adornment in general, St. Peter wrote, concerning Christian women, “Your beauty should not come from outward adornment, such as elaborate hairstyles and the wearing of gold jewelry or fine clothes. Rather, it should be that of your inner self, the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is of great worth in God’s sight.” (1 Peter 3: 3,4 NIV) And tattoos fall into the category of “outward adornment”, which Peter says to avoid.
Theologians usually give the following examples as reasons for ignoring most of Mosaic law:
1) We no longer stone sinners to death, as required by Mosaic Law. Theologians quote the following passage: “When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, ‘If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.’” (John 8: 7 NIV). But it so happens that the same Old Testament which requires that sinners be stoned to death also requires that the whole law be kept by everyone. However, “All have turned away, all have become corrupt; there is no one who does good, not even one.” (Psalm 14: 3) It being that “But to the wicked person, God says: ‘What right have you to recite my laws or take my covenant on your lips?’” (Psalm 50: 16 NIV)
So, when God decreed that sinners should be stoned to death, He also made us unfit to carry out such a sentence under the Law, because we have all sinned!
2) Theologians usually allege that we no longer offer sacrifices to God, as required by Mosaic Law. But we do! Every time we take communion we partake in the sacrifice of the Lamb. We don’t make any further sacrifice nowadays because that would imply that the Lamb was insufficient. However, in taking part in holy communion, we are indeed keeping the Law.
3) They also allege that we no longer need to keep the law which forbids God’s people to eat meat with the blood still in it: “And wherever you live, you must not eat the blood of any bird or animal.” (Leviticus 7: 26)
But, whenever we take communion, we eat of the Lamb out of which the blood was drained as He hung upon the cross. See this: “… one of the soldiers pierced Jesus’ side with a spear, bringing a sudden flow of blood and water.” (John 19: 34 NIV) Therefore, whether we agree with it or not, at the very least, we have to keep that law at communion. God made sure of that!
4) Theologians also like to quote the following, as examples of what no longer need apply in modern Christian society: “Keep my decrees. Do not mate different kinds of animals. Do not plant your field with two kinds of seed. Do not wear clothing woven of two kinds of material” (Leviticus 19: 19 NIV) as well as “Do not cut your bodies for the dead or put tattoo marks on yourselves. I am the LORD.” (Leviticus 19: 28 NIV) “A woman must not wear men’s clothing, nor a man wear women’s clothing, for the LORD your God detests anyone who does this.” (Deuteronomy 22: 5 NIV)
Some critics seem to think that such laws no longer apply to us, not for any sound theological reason, but because they “don’t make sense”!
However, rules such as these are, and always will be, important. They reflect God’s very creation and they reflect the life-giving force He gave us. In the beginning, when He made Heaven and Earth, He separated day from night; He separated land from sea; He made the animals and He made man and He made woman.
And the things that God made separate should be kept separate. Here are some examples as to why:
a) We cannot see “light”. We can only see the contrast between light and darkness. So we need BOTH, light and darkness, separately and in close proximity, for us not to be blind.
b) Likewise, we don’t hear sound when there’s only sound. For example, we can only hear the notes in a piece of music when they’re divided by intervals of silence. So we need BOTH, sound and silence, not to be deaf.
c) And a child needs a mother AND a father, not only to get generated but also as rôle models while it’s growing up. And I was taught that the more feminine the mother and the more masculine the father, the better for the child’s intuitive learning process….. (When feminists try to do away with gender rôles it’s like trying to do away with opposite poles in an electric current. Those creatures are trying to do away with the very ESSENCE of life!)
So God made a place for everything and put everything in its place. And in observing His laws we aren’t only learning His rules theoretically, as if we were simply sitting in front of a blackboard, but we’re following certain practices in our daily lives which are constant reminders for us to keep everything in its place – to observe the order which God put into His creation. God ordered His people to observe certain laws and festivals for this very purpose, so that they and their descendants would learn and never forget the things He showed them.
Examples:
(i) “Eat unleavened bread during those seven days; nothing with yeast in it is to be seen among you, nor shall any yeast be seen anywhere within your borders. On that day tell your son, ‘I do this because of what the LORD did for me when I came out of Egypt.’ This observance will be for you like a sign on your hand and a reminder on your forehead that this law of the LORD is to be on your lips. For the LORD brought you out of Egypt with his mighty hand.” (Exodus 13: 7-9 NIV)
(ii) “Live in temporary shelters for seven days: All native-born Israelites are to live in such shelters so your descendants will know that I had the Israelites live in temporary shelters when I brought them out of Egypt. I am the LORD your God.’” (Leviticus 23: 42,43 NIV)
Of course, in the same way that God gave us certain laws for men and certain others for women, He also gave certain laws for native-born Israelites, such as the laws for the Festival of Shelters. But the laws in general apply to all of God’s people:
“You are to have the same law for the alien and the native-born. I am the LORD your God.” (Leviticus 24: 22)
“The same law applies to the native-born and to the alien living among you.” (Exodus 12: 49)
“There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.” (Galatians 3: 28, 29)
So, in the same way that Jews and native-born Israelites live out the Exodus, and in the same way that they live out the time in which their ancestors wandered in the wilderness, we all must live out His creation on observing God’s instructions not to crossbreed animals; not to mix different kinds of seeds in a field; not to mix different materials in one’s clothes; not to mix ink and skin. We’re mimicking the very Creation in which God separated light and darkness; dry land and water; man and woman…. And Jesus told as that all the laws, including these which so many people hold in contempt, will remain valid until the end of the Creation. Therefore, if we don’t observe these laws – and so fail to be taught to keep separate things in their separate places – we get homosexuality; genderlessness; sexual confusion; immorality; abortion – along with many other problems…..
God made His creation by separating Heaven and Earth; darkness and light; land and water; male and female….. So when we bring things together which He made separate, and join a man with a man and a woman with a woman, for example, we are acting out the end of His creation. And when we bring ink and skin together we are also acting out the end of His creation, albeit less visibly…..
There’s also another aspect regarding keeping everything in its proper place: The notion which honest people have with regard to “clean” versus “dirty” has a lot to do with location. For example, money which someone earned is “clean money”; money gained by dishonest means is “dirty money”. Soil in the garden can be described as “clean soil”; a tiny speck of clean soil on a clean dress turns the latter into a “dirty dress”. A newly married couple go away on their “honeymoon” but an unmarried couple go away for a “dirty week-end”, in which the man and the woman are both in a bed in which they’re not supposed to be…….
5) Certain critics of the Bible like to point at the fact that God forbids killing, and yet ordered the Israelites to kill their enemies, and He blessed David in his battles against the Philistines. So what happened to David?
“King David rose to his feet and said: ‘Listen to me, my fellow Israelites, my people. I had it in my heart to build a house as a place of rest for the ark of the covenant of the LORD, for the footstool of our God, and I made plans to build it. But God said to me, ‘You are not to build a house for my Name, because you are a warrior and have shed blood.’” (1 Chronicles 28: 2,3)
So now let’s think of James Bond. He had a “licence to kill” but killing was still against the law. And David also had “a licence to kill” but then he wasn’t good enough to build a temple for God.
In fact, God Himself can override any of the laws He gave: “Again the LORD spoke to Ahaz, ‘Ask the LORD your God for a sign, whether in the deepest depths or in the highest heights.’ But Ahaz said, ‘I will not ask; I will not put the LORD to the test.’ Then Isaiah said, ‘Hear now, you house of David! Is it not enough to try the patience of men? Will you try the patience of my God also?’” (Isaiah 7: 10-13)
But, when Satan was tempting Jesus, “Jesus answered him, “It is also written: ‘Do not put the Lord your God to the test.’” (Matthew 4: 7) So, although God had told Ahaz to put Him to the test, that law was still in effect in the time of Jesus.
Likewise, when God told Moses to eat forbidden foods (per Acts 10: 9-16), that did not revoke any laws governing eating.
When God ordered Peter to eat forbidden foods He made them clean for Peter to eat. He did it because He was sending Peter amongst non-kosher foreigners, to join them to the people of God, and eating together was, and is, an important act by which people accept each other in brotherhood. But tattooed “Christians” are now alleging that their “Christian” tattoos attract other people to Christianity. But they are actually saying that they’re breaking a law to attract other members into breaking the same law to attract them to a religion (Christianity) in which we shouldn’t break that law….. It’s as if Peter had been sent to a kosher nation, encouraging its citizens to eat non-kosher foods, to attract them to a kosher religion by eating said non-kosher food!
Furthermore, it’s the Holy Spirit which takes hold of a person and joins him or her to God. And the Holy Spirit doesn’t need tattoos. And God doesn’t want tattoos. He actually said so!
Regarding eating, many are misled by the following passage: “‘Are you so dull?’ he asked. ‘Don’t you see that nothing that enters a man from the outside can make him ‘unclean’? For it doesn’t go into his heart but into his stomach, and then out of his body.’” (In saying this, Jesus declared all foods ‘clean.’)” (Mark 7: 18-19 NIV) However, when something is put in brackets, it’s a sign that the sentence is not in the original Greek Manuscripts, and so was added later.
6) Jesus said “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath” (Mark 2:27) and He said “Don’t you see that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and then out of the body? But the things that come out of a person’s mouth come from the heart, and these defile them. For out of the heart come evil thoughts—murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. These are what defile a person; but eating with unwashed hands does not defile them.” (Matthew 15: 17-20)
But He also said “….. until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law” (Matthew 5: 18 NIV) So it was, and still is, against the Law. Likewise, when God ordered the people of Israel to kill the Canaanites, it was an exception in a given period of History: it didn’t legalize killing in general……
So, when Jesus spoke about the Sabbath, and about eating with unwashed hands, He wasn’t revoking any laws. He was making an exception for His disciples (who had been picking grain on a sabbath because they were hungry), and He was also saying that eating with unwashed hands did not defile His disciples because whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and then out of the body.
(With regard to tattoos, however, from the point of view of physical cleanliness, they’re different to impurities entering the mouth via unwashed hands because, as the ink is injected into the skin, it’s too much to be removed by the body’s normal defence mechanisms. So the pigment becomes encapsulated in a band of collagen, which is why the “bodyart” stays in place forever! Encapsulation keeps the ink isolated from the rest of the body, protecting the latter from further contamination by the ink, which is categorically a foreign body. “Foreign body”, here, is a synonym for “dirt”. So, even if a tattooed person bathes daily, he or she will be a clean person but with pockets of dirt where the tattoos are.
People might argue that ink “per se” isn’t dirty. The body’s defence mechanism, however, tells us it is. And it has to be a contaminant to be used in tattooing, otherwise it won’t get encapsulated and the “artwork” will simply dissolve.)
7) Tattoo fans, for example, like to state that the Mosaic law against tattoos was intended solely as a means of keeping the people of Israel separate from tattooed pagans living at the time of Moses. It’s true that God ordered His people not to mix with other nations which worshipped other Gods, and that He ordered His people not to adopt other people’s religious practices or to worship their Gods, but He also gave many other laws for other purposes: laws against killing; against stealing; against lying and laws for educational purposes. There is nothing in the Old Testament which states that the law against tattoos was made solely to separate God’s people from pagans. The law simply states that we must not get tattooed. Period. And Jesus Christ did say that not one letter of the Law will change until Heaven and Earth pass away.
But let’s pretend, just for a moment, that the law against tattoos was made solely to separate God’s people from pagans:
It is true that the pagans of Moses’ time were bad rôle models for God’s people. But the typically tattooed gangsters and whores of today are also bad rôle models for God’s people. And the first middle-class people to get tattooed in our present society were youngsters who wished to defy their parents and society in general, which was a Christian society. So there really is no excuse for ostensively sincere Christians to follow the example provided by today’s bad rôle models, either, even if one were to accept the self-serving interpretation that the law against tattoos existed solely to separate God’s people from others……
Paul wrote passages such as the following:
“Do you not know, brothers and sisters—for I am speaking to those who know the law—that the law has authority over someone only as long as that person lives? For example, by law a married woman is bound to her husband as long as he is alive, but if her husband dies, she is released from the law that binds her to him. So then, if she has sexual relations with another man while her husband is still alive, she is called an adulteress. But if her husband dies, she is released from that law and is not an adulteress if she marries another man. So, my brothers and sisters, you also died to the law through the body of Christ, that you might belong to another, to him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit for God. For when we were in the realm of the flesh, the sinful passions aroused by the law were at work in us, so that we bore fruit for death. But now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been released from the law so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit, and not in the old way of the written code.” (Romans 7: 1-6)
BUT:
Then Paul wrote: “We know that the law is spiritual; but I am unspiritual, sold as a slave to sin. I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do. And if I do what I do not want to do, I agree that the law is good. As it is, it is no longer I myself who do it, but it is sin living in me. For I know that good itself does not dwell in me, that is, in my sinful nature. For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. For I do not do the good I want to do, but the evil I do not want to do—this I keep on doing. Now if I do what I do not want to do, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it. So I find this law at work: Although I want to do good, evil is right there with me. For in my inner being I delight in God’s law; but I see another law at work in me, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within me. What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body that is subject to death?” (Romans 7: 14-24)
You see, in the first passage he wrote “For when we were in the realm of the flesh, the sinful passions aroused by the law were at work in us,” meaning that sinful passions were no longer at work, and then in the second passage he said that – yes – they were at work in him!
He actually divided himself in two: the spirit that didn’t want to sin and the body that sinned anyway and so broke…… the Law!!! (Otherwise he wouldn’t have considered it a sin.)
Paul was furious at the “circumcision set” of people who preached that if you didn’t get physically circumcised you couldn’t be saved. He was furious because they were making salvation conditional on keeping the Law instead of preaching the “grace of God”. They were presenting God as a merchant of salvation. But he had no intention of preaching “No Law”. He did preach “No Law Simply To Buy Salvation”.
The following passage clarifies that he had no intention of preaching “No Law”:
“When they heard this, they praised God. Then they said to Paul: ‘You see, brother, how many thousands of Jews have believed, and all of them are zealous for the law. They have been informed that you teach all the Jews who live among the Gentiles to turn away from Moses, telling them not to circumcise their children or live according to our customs. What shall we do? They will certainly hear that you have come, so do what we tell you. There are four men with us who have made a vow. Take these men, join in their purification rites and pay their expenses, so that they can have their heads shaved. Then everyone will know there is no truth in these reports about you, but that you yourself are living in obedience to the law. As for the Gentile believers, we have written to them our decision that they should abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality.’ The next day Paul took the men and purified himself along with them. Then he went to the temple to give notice of the date when the days of purification would end and the offering would be made for each of them.” (Acts 21: 20-26)
So there should definitely be no doubt that the Law still applies to those Jews who followed (and still follow) Jesus.
Re the Gentiles, the disciples had decided to treat them on a “don’t ask, don’t tell” basis. But they did not have the authority to revoke a single letter of the Law which God gave through Moses and which Jesus said is to last until Heaven and Earth pass away. And they wouldn’t have regarded the Law as a burden if it were no longer in force…..
Peter said “Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of Gentiles a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear? No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are.” (Acts 15: 10,11 NIV) And the apostles wouldn’t have regarded the Law as a yoke if it were no longer in force…..
So “Instead we should write to them, telling them to abstain from food polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from the meat of strangled animals and from blood. For the law of Moses has been preached in every city from the earliest times and is read in the synagogues on every Sabbath.” (Acts 15: 20, 21 NIV)
You see? The sole preocupation of the apostles was salvation through grace. They found the Law too burdensome and apparently had no thought regarding a convert being called “least in the kingdom of heaven” or “great in the kingdom of heaven” for keeping the Law in general, per Matthew 5: 19.
BUT:
Once a person becomes aware of the Law as a whole he or she comes under the following rule: “If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not be guilty of sin; but now they have no excuse for their sin.” (John 15: 22)
And right now we have the whole Law in our Bibles.
Actually, it was Jesus who upheld the whole Law on behalf on those He saved, by being punished for all their sins, as the Law requires.
The truth is, the Law has no hold over those for whom Jesus died, because nobody may be punished a second time. Paul’s whole reasoning was based on that. All those whom Jesus saved have already been judged, condemned and punished for every single transgression, including wearing mixed fibres, committing adultery, robbing banks, having bad haircuts and getting tattooed. They have all been judged and then put to death in the person of Jesus Christ as He hung on the cross. So, on the day of Judgement, they won’t go on trial again, even if they’re all tattooed to the eyeballs. It’s the DOUBLE JEOPARDY RULE.
However, if, as a freed man or woman, someone fails to even try to keep the Law simply because it won’t buy salvation, then that person is being just as venal as someone who tries to buy salvation simply by keeping the Law.
9) It’s very common for modern would-be Christians to behave as if anything goes, as long as they’re acting out of what they perceive to be “love”:
But God taught us “You are not to do as we do here today, everyone doing as they see fit,” (Deuteronomy 12: 8 NIV)
He gave us two examples of well-intentioned people doing as they saw fit:
a) “Aaron’s sons Nadab and Abihu took their censers, put fire in them and added incense; and they offered unauthorized fire before the LORD, contrary to his command. So fire came out from the presence of the LORD and consumed them, and they died before the LORD.” (Leviticus 10: 1,2 NIV).
b) “When they came to the threshing floor of Nacon, Uzzah reached out and took hold of the ark of God, because the oxen stumbled. The LORD’s anger burned against Uzzah because of his irreverent act; therefore God struck him down and he died there beside the ark of God.” (2 Samuel 6: 6,7 NIV) Uzzah had good intentions and wanted to save the ark from falling but only a specially ordained priest was allowed to touch the ark, which Uzzah wasn’t.
God has made it clear to us that it’s not enough to want to please Him. We have to take the trouble to find out His will in order to please Him.
And John wrote: “This is how we know that we love the children of God: by loving God and carrying out his commands.” (1 John 5: 2 NIV)
10) “Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters. And so I tell you, every kind of sin and slander can be forgiven, but blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.” (Matthew 12: 30-32 NIV)
Many think that, since God saves by grace alone, and that every sin will be forgiven (except the sin against the Holy Spirit) the Law no longer applies, as if grace and the Law were mutually exclusive…. They are not! One is saved by grace alone but that’s no excuse for not trying to keep the Law, too, out of love for God. For “this is love for God: to obey his commands. And his commands are not burdensome,” (1 John 5: 3 NIV)
So we should, in fact, try to keep the Law out of love and not to purchase salvation. The following passage refers to keeping the law out of love for God and not out of fear of punishment:
“’The days are coming,’ declares the LORD, when I will make a new covenant with the people of Israel and with the people of Judah. It will not be like the covenant I made with their ancestors when I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt, because they broke my covenant, though I was a husband to them,’ declares the LORD. ‘This is the covenant I will make with the people of Israel after that time,’ declares the LORD. ‘I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people. No longer will they teach their neighbor, or say to one another, ‘Know the LORD,’ because they will all know me, from the least of them to the greatest,’ declares the LORD. ‘For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more.’” (Jeremiah 31: 31-34 NIV)
The Old Covenant demanded obedience and, in return, the people of Israel would be allowed to live and prosper in the Promised Land. In the New Covenant, God promised to write the Law on people’s hearts. But he did not change one single comma …
But, even so, many people believe that, since they now have the Law “in their hearts” they no longer need to obey the laws which God gave us through Moses. However, when God promised to put the Law in our minds and hearts, there was only one set of laws in existence and so it was to that set of laws that He was referring: the laws of Moses. And, with those laws in our hearts, we are now expected to obey them out of love for God and not out of fear of punishment, or to purchase salvation.
If we acknowledge that Jesus Christ spoke the Truth when he said that not one letter of the Law will be revoked, then we can fully confess ALL our transgressions. And only then can we ask for forgiveness for ALL of them. And only then can we acknowledge EVERYTHING that He died for and thank Him for everything………
However, if a person claims that certain laws no longer apply, say, to eating shrimps, or to getting a tattoo, then he or she will eat shrimps or get a tattoo and say “I broke no law!” But John wrote:
“If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us.” (1 John: 1: 8-10 NIV) And Luke wrote that “He said to them, ‘You are the ones who justify yourselves in the eyes of others, but God knows your hearts. What people value highly is detestable in God’s sight.’” (Luke 16: 15 NIV)
If a person rejects any part of the Law, alleging that it no longer applies, or that it doesn’t apply to him or herself, then that person is denying the need for salvation as far as that part of the Law is concerned. Which amounts to refusing to be saved altogether, since one can be condemned for any single transgression under the Law. What really matters isn’t that you got a bad haircut, or ate shrimps, or got a tattoo. What matters is whether you say “forgive me my trespass” or not.
We should try to keep the Law as freed men and women – as much of it as we can. Obviously, nobody manages to keep all of the Law (the Bible acknowledges this.) But, equally obviously, a person who gets tattooed isn’t even trying!
Furthermore, even if someone is convinced that he (or she) has been saved, it’s still not advisable to wantonly break any law such as the one forbidding tattoos, if we can possibly avoid it, simply because Jesus died to redeem His followers. Because that would amount to frivolous treatment of His sacrifice. The following passage is illustrative of this:
“David longed for water and said, ‘Oh, that someone would get me a drink of water from the well near the gate of Bethlehem!’ So the three mighty men broke through the Philistine lines, drew water from the well near the gate of Bethlehem and carried it back to David. But he refused to drink it; instead, he poured it out before the LORD. ‘Far be it from me, O LORD, to do this!’ he said. ‘Is it not the blood of men who went at the risk of their lives?’ And David would not drink it.” (2 Samuel 23: 15-17)
“The second beast was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed. It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.” (Revelation 13: 15-17 NIV) Of course, people are getting themselves tattooed all over their bodies so their tattoos don’t correspond to the mark of the beast referred to in “Revelation”. But any tattoo is against the laws which God gave to Moses and which Jesus Christ said will not be revoked until Heaven and Earth pass away (Matthew 5: 17,18). And the tattoo craze has been contributing to the fulfilment of the above passage in Revelation by breaking down the moral barriers which existed against tattooing until recently. The tattoo industry is paving the way for an easy acceptance of the mark of the beast when it should be imposed. It will be “just one more tattoo”…….